All Categories
Featured
Table of Contents
Key challenges include recognizing and handling these risks effectively, stabilizing employee requires with compliance, and adapting MTC rules for safe and secure and cost-efficient mobility. If handled well, remote work can be a tactical advantage for multinationals, offering functional connection and access to talent. Relying on outdated policies could create liabilities, such as unexpected tax exposure and compliance burdens.
Daida Hadzic is Director, KPMG LLP.
Words by Kevin McKenna, Elder Advisor, EMIR Mirages typically deceive the eye in the desert, appealing water and relief where there is none. Likewise, the Middle East, at the moment, can appear daunting to worldwide magnate who wrongly take a look at it as one uniform bloc. But unlike mirages, and in spite of geopolitical tensions in the more comprehensive area, the Gulf Co-Operation Council (GCC) economies' capacity is no illusion.
Yet, many local leaders of international companies still have a hard time to unshackle themselves from mistaken beliefs and predispositions held by an international HQ that often takes a look at the Middle East through a narrow keyhole. Global spending plan holders' typically misguided viewpoints can lead to missed out on chances and hinder development. With over a decade of experience advising regional organization leaders in the Middle East, I have actually seen how vital it is to make the case for the region by concentrating on these five basic actions.
This location likewise runs extremely differently from our domestic market, so do not expect the exact same linear paths to growth and timelines." This technique requires robust preparation, clear interaction, a deep regional network and a rich understanding of the local service environment since, eventually, you have to deliver on that guaranteed development.
By resolving misunderstandings and engaging proactively, regional CEOs can unlock the area's true capacity, changing viewed mirages into a sanctuary of opportunities waiting to be found.
Organize a session with our professionals to check out how YCP can help you in addressing your business difficulties.
Likewise, concerning Israel's controversial policies of limiting humanitarian help into Gaza, the Trump administration has followed Netanyahu's lead. Israel's full blockade of Gaza from March 2 through mid-May sparked a remarkable degeneration in humanitarian conditions. In May, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), an Israeli- and U.S.-backed alternative to the UN help circulation system in Gaza, began operations at four circulation sites.
Taken together, these policies show 2 intertwined components of the Trump administration's approach to Gaza: a deference to Prime Minister Netanyahu's preferences and a deprioritization of humanitarian needs. The administration has actually not pressed back on the Israeli federal government's plans to inhabit Gaza City and forcibly leave Palestinians into a smaller area of Gaza.
He consequently published on social media that the only way to get hostages out of Gaza is when Hamas is "confronted and damaged," relatively using tacit support for Israel's broadening operations. The Trump administration's complacent method to Gaza's aggravating humanitarian situationmarked by a formal statement of scarcity in parts of Gazaunderscores the devastating impact of its acquiescence to the Israeli government's refusal to provide appropriate aid to the besieged territory. They can best be captured by unpacking how Israel and Saudi Arabiaeach with strong ties to the United Stateshave responded. Not remarkably, their responses vary considerably in all 3 cases. Their actions likewise reflect the growing disparity between these two regional powers as they pursue extensively differing methods for how to form the Middle East's emerging order.
It has signified a desire to use force whenever and anywhere dangers emerge. This determination has equated into ever-bolder military interventions across the region that have redrawn the Middle East's balance of power. Yet, Israel has actually not translated these military gains into withstanding strategic wins. For Saudi Arabiathe Arab world's present center of gravitythe necessary for financial diversity has actually fueled a drive to de-escalate stress in the region, a push for post-conflict stabilization in the Levant, and aspirations to build out commercial and trade ties across the Middle East and beyond.
As with Israel, nevertheless, whether and how Saudi Arabia translates its expanding utilize into long lasting tactical gains stays to be seen. Israel was highly helpful of the U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear centers.
Israel has made clear that it will strike Iran againideally with U.S. supportin either situation. Absent a clear U.S. "red light" opposing additional Israeli military intervention in Iran, potentially combined with a U.S.Increasingly, the Gulf views Israel, not Iran, as the primary threat to regional stability.
Latest Posts
Achieving Strategic Excellence in the Middle East
Navigating Regional Market Strategy in 2026
Key Benefits of Strategic Excellence in the GCC

